Establishing the Case for the Indictment of Barack Obama for Treason

Establishing the Case for the Indictment of Barack Obama for Treason

 

Vincent J Iori

Now that US Attorney General, Eric Holder has filed Obama’s nuisance suit against the people of Arizona, it behooves us to give thought as to what should be the logical next step:  The indictment, arrest and prosecution of ‘President’ Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama) and Attorney General Eric Holder (aka the deputy butcher of Waco) for treason!  In order to support this cause of action, let facts be presented to establish the matter.

What the Constitution Says

Article 1 — Creates the Legislative Branch (i.e. Congress)

Article 1, Section 8 Enumerates the powers delegated to Congress, specifically:

Clause 4:  To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

Clause 15:  To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Article II Creates the Executive Branch and describes the duties of the President:

Article II, Section 1:

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Article II, Section 3:

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Article 4 –Duties owed by the United States to the States:

Article 4, Section 4

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

11th Amendment

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

14th Amendment, Clause 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Constitutional Review

Reviewing the United States Constitution, we observed several pertinent points, namely:

  1. Congress is authorized to define “Uniform Rules of Naturalization” NOT to naturalize foreigners!  The power to naturalize belongs to the States according to whatever rules Congress has enacted at the time.  Congress can also define who is a person legally or illegally present in the United States.
  2. Congress is empowered to enact laws for the purpose of carrying out 1) above and enforce said laws.
  3. The President (and all other public officials for that matter) is required to swear an oath to uphold the United States Constitution as a condition of assuming office and an ongoing condition of remaining in office throughout the duration of his term.  Failure or refusal to do so constitutes immediate forfeiture of office!
  4. The President is required to faithfully execute the laws of the Union (including those pertaining to border patrol, dealing with illegal aliens, etc).  A President does NOT get to pick and choose what Constitutional provisions he feels like upholding.
  5. The United States OWES to each and every State in this Union the duty of protecting each from invasion amongst other duties.  As a result, Congress has the power to enact laws for the purpose of carrying out this duty and the President has a known lawful duty to execute those laws.  Both Congress and especially the President have failed, willfully in this endeavor.
  6. Federal Courts MAY NOT be used to adjudicate or hear cases involving Foreign States as plaintiff versus any member State of the Union.  Thus the current suit against Arizona is frivolous because it includes Mexico as a plaintiff and should be dismissed on these grounds alone.
  7. No person who has EVER held a State office, seat in Congress or ANY federal office AND sworn an oath to uphold the United States Constitution who has engaged in rebellion or insurrection (i.e. introduced, voted in favor of or signed any legislation which violates any provision of the United States Constitution) may hold ANY public office anywhereDid Obama ever propose, support or vote in favor of any legislation as an Illinois State Senator which violates the United States Constitution?  If so he was not eligible to hold his previous office as US Senator nor his current office as President.  Likewise, did Obama ever propose, support or vote in favor of any legislation as a US Senator which violates the United States Constitution?   If so he does not lawfully occupy the office of President!  If either or both of the above are true then his cabinet appointees (including Attorney General Holder) don’t occupy their positions and have no authority to bring this action against Arizona!

The Suit Itself is a Scam

This suit is defective on its very surface.  First, the suit alleges a false legal theory commonly known as the so called ‘Federal Supremacy Clause”.  Under this ideology, laws enacted at the Federal level purportedly trump laws enacted at the State and Local levels.  This line of thought is FALSE and is NOT supported by the Constitution but does have a half truth to it.  The correct application is that when a federal law is enacted pursuant to any power specifically delegated to Congress in the Constitution and thus applicable within the States that such law overrides any state laws to the contrary.  However, Congress does not have the authority to enact any law it so chooses within the States thus not all so called laws enacted by Congress override State laws.  Congress does have unlimited powers in some geographical locations: 1. District of Columbia, 2. Lands within the States (i.e. military bases) where the State Legislature specifically ceded jurisdiction, and territories acquired by the United States (i.e. Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands).

Even where Congress may lawfully administer a law within the territory of a State, this does NOT automatically preclude a State from enacting its own laws on the same subject so long as they do not IMPEDE administration of the applicable federal law.  The law enacted by Arizona does NOT impede the feds from administering current immigration laws!  It simply authorizes that State’s police who have already stopped, detained or arrested someone for some other alleged offense and have probable cause to believe that person might be unlawfully present in the United States to ask said person for documentation of their status (i.e. show passport, green card, visa, etc).  Obama and the feds are free right now to decide they wish to execute the current laws of the Union with respect to immigration.  Arizona’s law does NOT in any way, shape or form impede them from so doing.  Therefore the suit’s claim of federal supremacy is flat out frivolous!  Likewise even when the States have delegated a power to Congress in the Constitution, that does NOT render a State powerless to act in its own interests in the event that Congress fails or refuses to carry out the duty in question as is clearly the case here.

As we discussed above, the 11th Amendment prohibits federal courts from hearing cases brought against a State by a Foreign State.  Since Mexico is a party to this suit, (see Mexican Govt. joining Obama in lawsuit against Arizona) , the suit is invalid and the court must therefore grant any request by Arizona for dismissal as the court simply does NOT have jurisdiction to hear the matter!

Obama’s Failures

It takes little to establish that the Obama Regime has failed miserably in its responsibilities to execute the currents laws concerning immigration.  Although this problem pre dates Obama, he is, nevertheless, in position NOW to address the matter but flat out refuses as we will soon firmly establish.  It is this willful refusal that proves criminal intent and justifies his indictment!

Obama Wages War on Arizona/America

There’s a huge difference between someone who tries his best to do something but falls short and someone who willfully refuses to do so, willfully attempts to sabotage others attempting to act in their own interests, engages in subversion of the current laws he is charged with executing, colludes and conspires with others (i.e. Mexican government), and engages in acts of harassment (the present suit against Arizona)!

To prove willfulness on the part of the Obama Regime let’s cite some specific examples:

  1. Obama has ignored clearly defined Constitutional law concerning his duties to execute the established laws of the Union currently in effect regarding the subject of immigration. (see Why is the President Ignoring the Constitution).
  2. Obama has jumped into bed and colluded with Mexico’s President against a fellow member State of the Union.  Just whose country is he ‘president’ of?
  3. Obama allowed Mexico’s President (a foreign head of state) to address Congress and effectively bash a member State of the Union right on the floor of Congress.  In additional he effectively lectured Congress as to how America should be run.  This is beyond the ordinary show of respect for a visiting head of state.  Is this acceptable conduct on the part of an ‘American’ president or is it proof of willful disregard for American principles?
  4. Obama has given more money to Mexico, a foreign country, despite the fact that NO Constitutional provision provides for foreign aid, period, than the amount of money allocated to Arizona’s National Guard, a member State of the Union!  Is this an ‘oversight’ or does this prove intent?  (see Gov. Brewer says Obama Giving Mexico Double the Money that it gives to Arizona for Nat. Guard Protection).
  5. Obama has launched and aided a boycott of Arizona, an American State!  Does this, by itself, not constitute economic terrorism?  (see Obama Administration Launches Boycott of Arizona).
  6. Is it appropriate for a President to tell a US Senator (John Kyl) to his face that he, Obama, is not securing the border deliberately in order to get amnesty approved for 20 to 30 million illegal aliens already present in the United States?  Is this appropriate conduct for a president given his known lawful duties to execute the existing laws of the Union?  (see Senator: Obama Told Me He’s Not Securing Border on Purpose).
  7. Obama has a history of supporting amnesty for illegal aliens (i.e. law breakers) dating to his days as a US Senator!  His record for colluding with the late Ted Kennedy and his presidential ‘opponent’ John McCain (who since has been forced to change his tune in an election year) during the regime of George W Bush is well documented.  Fortunately those of us who have been active on this issue were able to keep this from happening!

The Case for Indictment

As we have now established beyond doubt, overwhelming evidence exist justifying the immediate indictment, arrest, physical removal from office, prosecution and punishment for treason for Barack Hussein Obama (or is it Barry Soetoro?).  Furthermore the same applies for Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder for willfully assisting in the evasion of Obama’s known lawful duties as well as his own.  The question now becomes:  Can Congress be trusted to do this OR will the American people need to take matters into their own hands?  Can the American people afford to allow this problem to go on any longer considering the current economic depression this country is in and will likely remain in for at least the next 5 to 10 years?  Do the American people have a duty to tolerate a President or any other public office holder who willfully refuses to carry out his known, sworn duties to the best of his abilities?  Don’t you, the American people, deserve better?

____________________________________________________________________________________________

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card. Use this link: DONATE

(c) Vincent J Iori 2010

About Vince Iori

Vince Iori is one of the latest personalities to go public in the ongoing struggle to retake America. Realizing that there is a real need for Truth, Integrity and Leadership in this country, Vince has responded to the call of duty to speak out with truthful, no nonsense solutions to the problems America currently faces.  Understanding that America will NEVER be restored to its former greatness as long as the current Luciferian cabal of economic/political and socialist war criminals, who have willfully waged undeclared war against the American people (and the rest of the world), are permanently removed from power and prosecuted, Vince endeavors to educate and spiritually prepare the American people for the coming war ahead. . See Vince’s complete bio at: http://www.vincesblog.org/about.htm

Vince Iori’s commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished, reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does not charge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column is copied intact and that full credit is given and that Vince’s web site address is included.

Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions or advertising who want to run these columns must contact Vince Iori for permission. Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling an interview with Vince should contact vince@vinceiori.org

Please visit Vince’s web sites at:

vinceiori.org

Vince’s Blog Talk Radio Page

Vince on Twitter

Checkout all of Vince’s articles here

Share Far and Wide

You must be logged in to post a comment Login